Pro Football is forever evolving and with that teams should
as well, right?
We’re all familiar with the phrase ‘it’s a copy-cat league’,
so here is the fundamental problem! It’s time to “STEP OUTSIDE THE BOX”!! Out
of all the colleges (approximately 884 schools with a varsity football team) in
the United States, the National Football League still has an issue finding 32
elite level quarterbacks for every team. Even though it’s regarded as the most
important position in all of sports, confused, well you should be.
Problem #1 – Lack of Appropriate Evaluation
Each school must provide a listing to NFL teams scouting
departments with their evaluation of their best players. From this listing it
is revised and dissected to provide a ranking system to set these players apart
(we see this typically done for the NFL Draft). However, why are certain
players being left off these lists and being picked up as UDFA (undrafted free
agents), or left out of the league all together? The vast list of players that
have made an impact in the NFL not being drafted in the first round is
staggering and I put into question why are these NFL professionals constantly
missing the boat?
The NFL relies on the NCAA programs to filter players during
the evaluation process and provide smaller lists for pro scouts, making it less
daunting. I realize out of 884 schools in the USA that house football programs,
evaluating nearly 50,000 players per year is a near impossible task. The
perception is that if an individual doesn’t play for a Division 1 program they
don’t deserve as much attention from the pro level. This is where I believe NFL
teams; especially QB hungry teams are missing out.
Problem #2 – Neglecting the Numbers Game
One major aspect we love about football is the numbers.
Every year we compile statistics to evaluate how players perform, evaluate if
they can improve, or if it’s a potential decline. Don’t get me wrong, I do
believe there is a pure ‘gut talent evaluation’ ability that some people
possess. However the evaluation process doesn’t seem to be viewed and
understood with sheer numbers. Teams employ a tactic when it comes to the NFL
draft of drafting a quarterback every year hoping one will pan out, sounds like
dart board logic to me. Let’s review simple logic;
·
128 division-one programs in the USA, that’s 128
potential quarterbacks divided by 32 NFL teams, roughly 4 quarterbacks per
team. Obviously some will have more talent than others, which increases
competition for teams to over draft these players thus not receiving the
optimal value for their draft picks.
·
884 football programs in the US, that’s 884
potential quarterbacks divided by 32 NFL teams. That increases your evaluation
to roughly 27.6 quarterbacks per team! By sheer numbers alone you have
increased the chances of finding an elite quarterback by 7 times in one year,
that’s not something that should be overlooked.
I realize the accuracy of the total numbers will fluctuate
based on player declaration willing to leave school, but I wanted to paint a
very bias picture to how these players aren’t getting a fair shake. The value
of potentially finding a franchise QB is there.
Problem #3 – Unwillingness to Adapt
Like finding the right partner, the same can be said with
finding a quarterback. The NFL is very impatient and once you choose your
signal caller the Coach and GM are married to that decision for better or
worse. The issue like any relationship is accepting that person for what they
are. If you chose player X to lead your team why are you making him change the
way he does things? Unless the talent level is elite, he probably possesses a
certain skill-set that will work in certain systems. Changing the way you deal
with problems (or your offensive system in this case) would benefit both
parties rather than forcing them to act the way you want.
We see this copy-cat attempt to mirror the mighty New
England Patriots with laughable failure. Rome wasn’t built in a day and neither
were the Pats. Bill Belichick realized after hitting the lotto with Tom Brady
that adapting the offensive system every year would not only keep teams
guessing, but would enable him to bring single skill-set players at lower
salaries to perform at the highest levels. I hear all the time “how can they
keep doing this”, “they don’t stop winning”, rest assured it’s no fluke, ADAPT
& CHANGE!
·
Draft a quarterback for what he is and make your
system work for him.
·
Don’t draft a quarterback in hopes to develop
him to something he will never be.
·
As an evaluator, understand the difference
between the two.
Problem #4 – Lack of Experience & Repetition
Once drafted, the second part of the evaluation becomes just
as important. Quarterbacks will take time to develop simply because the pro
game vs the college game is vastly different. In life how does one develop
their craft to reach their full potential? “Practice makes perfect”. As stated
above, the NFL is very impatient, and follow the coined the phrase ‘what have
you done for me lately’. Quarterbacks
that don’t show instant progress get pushed down the depth chart and seemingly
left to wither away like a piece of fruit on the counter.
The realization is that there are only so many reps to go
around and training camp time is extremely valuable. Teams can afford to hire
extra coaches to provide that training and commitment to develop a young talent
without affecting the first string preparation for the upcoming season, so why
don’t they? Young quarterbacks low on the depth chart need those reps to
perfect their skills and learn how to play the pro game. Third stringers will
receive the lowest snap count in camp and only see four to five quarters of
live game action, how can anyone develop an opinion based on that? Invest in
the players and the returns should follow.
Problem #5 – Understand the Person
So far it sounds like I am fully against how the leadership
of NFL teams handle the players. There is one aspect of this circle that is
100% on the players. Let’s review;
·
Ambition
·
Heart
·
Motivation
·
Character
·
Intelligence
·
Confidence
Players can have all the ability in the world but if these
traits are not identified it’s a recipe for disaster. Should any person growing
up in extreme conditions that aren’t conducive to positive development, get a
pass for losing ambition once their lucrative salary enters their bank account?
It happens all the time! For every Tom Brady there will be five Jamarcus
Russell’s or Johnny Manziel’s. These leadership groups need to develop a system
where spontaneous answers differ from the scripted ones during the draft
combine process, and provides the appropriate evaluation needed on one’s entire
character.
Comments
Post a Comment